Post by thevicarsson on Jun 11, 2009 10:59:07 GMT -5
In assemby the other day a vicar(so to speak) from the local methodists came to school and the subject was environment and he explained that Genisis is actually works with science. Although this is opposite to the board title i believe it might be relevant.
I'm just thinking though, that if that is true how is Darwins theory so flawed in parts. Although it all strings together nicely to form a neat poster for the science graph. Which parts are of skeleton finds, and which are simply 'theory'. What if Charles Darwin got all this wrong, what if its simply not happened this way.
The BBC* is showing lots of interesting documentaries on evolution put repeatedly forgets that it is simply a theory, forcing on the watchers this view that Evolution is real and not to be disagreed with. The whole evolution season seems to not be regulated. They seem to be showing 100 evolution programs to 1 loosely creation program.
Worrying that even though Darwins research is most likely true and has definetaly been iconic to us in the way we've lived our life for 150 years(which leads to why he published at 50 when he had most of the info at 40 but) what is your take on this situation is the start creation or evolution. Or is evolution creation in a different form to that of Genisis.
It is also a well known fact Genisis and Revelation were written in the same era, so maybe Genisis shouldn't be read too literally. I wish I could write more on this topic but i believe you guys should get to air your views before i die writing this message.
Matty
*BBC is a channel here in britain(British Broadcasting Company) its the major channel over here.
I'm just thinking though, that if that is true how is Darwins theory so flawed in parts. Although it all strings together nicely to form a neat poster for the science graph. Which parts are of skeleton finds, and which are simply 'theory'. What if Charles Darwin got all this wrong, what if its simply not happened this way.
The BBC* is showing lots of interesting documentaries on evolution put repeatedly forgets that it is simply a theory, forcing on the watchers this view that Evolution is real and not to be disagreed with. The whole evolution season seems to not be regulated. They seem to be showing 100 evolution programs to 1 loosely creation program.
Worrying that even though Darwins research is most likely true and has definetaly been iconic to us in the way we've lived our life for 150 years(which leads to why he published at 50 when he had most of the info at 40 but) what is your take on this situation is the start creation or evolution. Or is evolution creation in a different form to that of Genisis.
It is also a well known fact Genisis and Revelation were written in the same era, so maybe Genisis shouldn't be read too literally. I wish I could write more on this topic but i believe you guys should get to air your views before i die writing this message.
Matty
*BBC is a channel here in britain(British Broadcasting Company) its the major channel over here.